A protest at a UC Berkeley dean's house (2024)

Good morning. I’m Paul Thornton, and it is Saturday, April 13, 2024. Let’s look back at the week in Opinion.

Or, perhaps it’s better to say let’s look back at the week in Opinion writers. One such writer is contributor Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the UC Berkeley School of Law, where his wife Catherine Fisk is also on the faculty. An expert on constitutional law who has argued cases before the U.S. Supreme Court, Chemerinsky has written op-ed articles in The Times saying the 14th Amendment requires disqualifying former President Trump and urging the justices to protect access to the abortion drug mifepristone, among myriad other topics. He was also the founding dean of UC Irvine Law School, and he chaired the commission that revised the city of Los Angeles charter in the late 1990s. You’d have a hard time finding a more public service-minded scholar in California than Chemerinsky.

He also happens to be Jewish and a supporter of the two-state solution, meaning he supports the creation of a Palestinian state alongside Israel. Last fall, he wrote a Times op-ed article on the withering antisemitism directed at him and others at UC Berkeley since the Oct. 7 attack on Israel by Hamas. By outward appearances Chemerinsky has nonetheless maintained his genial disposition, evidenced by the invitation he extended to law students for dinner parties at his and Fisk’s home near Berkeley.

Advertisem*nt

But after what happened in their backyard Tuesday, Chemerinsky and Fisk may decide never to host students at their home again (and for the record, they indicated the dinner parties they had already scheduled for law students would go forward). As you’ve probably seen by now, a pro-Palestinian law student who was invited and several activists tried to hijack the event, prompting a confrontation with Fisk and Chemersinky.

And why Chemerinsky’s home? Because he’s Jewish? A Zionist? He’s expressed opposition to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government and support for the creation of a Palestinian state, but evidently nothing he actually says matters.

Fisk put her hand on the activist and appeared to grab her, and Chemerinsky demanded she leave while she was still speaking calmly. In my view, those actions are regrettable, but it’s their house, not mine, and certainly not the students.’

The situation in Gaza is unacceptable. Israeli forces have killed more than 33,000 people there since Oct. 7, and Netanyahu has given no indication that he plans on stopping there. But as one reader wrote in a letter to the editor lamenting an aborted attempt at interfaith dialogue between Muslims and Jews in Los Angeles, no one here caused the violence in Gaza — not Chemerinsky and Fisk, and not pro-Palestinian UC Berkeley students.

We don’t have to tear each other down here, and we certainly shouldn’t abuse the hospitality of law professors because they are Jewish. That should go without saying, but sadly it doesn’t in this environment.

“Two murders in Brentwood? That was unusual.” Editorial writer Carla Hall takes us back 30 years ago to the chaotic time she covered, as a Times reporter, the killings of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldberg, and the police pursuit and murder trial of O.J. Simpson, who died this week. “On Thursday when news of his death broke, a source texted me that he was talking to a 20-something colleague about O.J. and ‘She barely had any idea who he was. LOL,” Hall writes. “Yeah, LOL indeed.”

Benjamin Netanyahu’s government is to blame for rift in historic Israel-U.S. alliance. “In the wake of the Hamas attack, Israel had the support and sympathy of much of the world,” writes The Times editorial board. “But the unremitting fierceness of its actions in Gaza eroded that goodwill so swiftly and completely that even President Biden has expressed increasing levels of dismay over the actions and attitudes of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government.”

Advertisem*nt

A pregnant legal scholar in Arizona says the state’s abortion ban fails the law and families. Caitlin Millat, a law professor at Arizona State University, says that when she was reading her state’s Supreme Court ruling that that a law banning abortion passed in 1864 (nearly half a century before Arizona became a state) was still in effect, she found herself “unconsciously clutching my stomach — a sign that my objections went beyond legal analysis.”

Enjoying this newsletter? Consider subscribing to the Los Angeles Times

Your support helps us deliver the news that matters most. Become a subscriber.

Jack Smith is pushing to get Donald Trump’s Jan. 6 trial moving before the election. The special counsel’s latest filing to the Supreme Court says Trump’s Jan. 6 case should be “remanded for trial,” because whatever immunity the justices find a president might have, that immunity cannot shield Trump from prosecution. Columnist Harry Litman explains why this risky move could be what gets the Jan. 6 trial back on track.

L.A.’s Pershing Square is getting another makeover. Will this time finally be the charm? Is it the most ornate parking garage roof in L.A., or just really unwelcoming park? Whatever it is, downtown L.A.’s Pershing Square has been alienating passersby since 1994, when the park was elevated above street level and took the appearance of a concrete-moated urban fortress. Now, former Times reporter Larry Gordon, who covered Pershing Square’s renovation and reopening in 1994, says what concerns him more than yet another makeover is the deterioration of the downtown neighborhood around the park.

Tenant unions are finding power in numbers to fight L.A.’s housing crisis. Tenant organizers Annie Powers and Leonardo Vilchis-Zarate say that renters banding together in their own buildings as unions may be more effective at addressing the fundamental problem of the housing crisis — keeping people housed — than government providing bare-bones legal representation in eviction court.

More from this week in opinion

From our columnists

  • Jonah Goldberg: The latest sign that Republicans are abandoning even their most deeply held principles
  • Robin Abcarian: California workers, does your boss bug you after hours and on weekends? This bill is for you
  • Jackie Calmes: Trump 1.0 made some world leaders laugh. Trump 2.0 terrifies them

From the op-ed desk

  • Think life just keeps getting worse? Try being nostalgic — for the present
  • I was homeless in college. California can do more for students who sleep in their cars

From the editorial board

  • Financial literacy is important for teens to learn along with math and science
  • So many potholes in L.A. — and not enough people to fix them

Letters to the editor

  • Will the baseball gods curse the Dodgers over Shohei Ohtani’s home run ball?
  • President Biden now wants a cease-fire. Would that help Hamas?
  • L.A. shanks its shot at deterring city golf tee-time brokers

Stay in touch.

If you’ve made it this far, you’re the kind of reader who’d benefit from

subscribing

to our other newsletters

and to The Times

.

As always, you can share your feedback by emailing me at

paul.thornton@latimes.com

.

A protest at a UC Berkeley dean's house (2024)

FAQs

What did the students at UC Berkeley protest in the 1960s? ›

The Free Speech Movement began in 1964 when UC Berkeley students protested the university's restrictions on political activities on campus. Small sit-ins and demonstrations escalated into a series of large-scale rallies and protests demanding full constitutional rights on campus.

What is the Berkeley free speech controversy? ›

The Free Speech Movement (FSM) refers to a period in 1964 when UC Berkeley students successfully fought against an administrative ban on on-campus political activities. The FSM sparked a wave of student activism that became a core part of the campus's identity through the Vietnam War and far beyond.

What was significant about the Berkeley Free Speech Movement of 1964? ›

The Free Speech Movement had long-lasting effects at the Berkeley campus and was a pivotal moment for the civil liberties movement in the 1960s. It was seen as the beginning of the famous student activism that existed on the campus in the 1960s, and continues to a lesser degree today.

What was the Free Speech Movement in 1965? ›

On Nov. 20, 1965 the Free Speech Movement (FSM) of the University of California, Berkeley, organized a protest of several thousand students outside a meeting of the Regents of the University of California. The regents were gathered to discuss how to deal with the FSM.

What role did students play in the protest movements of the 1960s? ›

Student activist Marco Savio founded and led the Free Speech Movement, which spread across college campuses. Between 1960 and 1966, students initially protested civil rights, property, and campus issues before becoming active in the antiwar movement at the height of the Vietnam War.

What was the main reason for student protests during the 1960s and 1970s? ›

The growth of the New Left and student radicalism began in the early 1960s and reached its height during 1968. This new political movement sprouted protests on college campuses from the East Coast to the West Coast on issues including the Vietnam War, free speech, the environment, and racism.

What techniques did the students on the Berkeley campus use to protest for free speech? ›

What techniques did the students on the Berkeley campus use to protest for free speech? Sit-ins, they also participated in campus wide strikes that stopped classes. What kind of society did the counterculture want to build?

What happened at Berkeley university in the 1960s? ›

The Free Speech Movement (FSM) was a student protest which took place during the 1964–1965 academic year on the campus of the University of California, Berkeley under the informal leadership of students Mario Savio, Jack Weinberg, Brian Turner, Bettina Apthecker, Steve Weissman, Art Goldberg, Jackie Goldberg, and ...

What is inappropriate free speech? ›

Speech or materials may be deemed obscene (and therefore unprotected) if the speech meets the following (extremely high) threshold: It (1) appeals to the “prurient” interest in sex (defined as a morbid, degrading and unhealthy interest in sex, as distinguished from a mere candid interest in sex), (2) is patently ...

What was the issue that sparked the Free Speech Movement at Berkeley quizlet? ›

The Free Speech Movement began in 1964, when students at the University of California, Berkeley protested a ban on on-campus political activities. The protest was led by several students, who also demanded their right to free speech and academic freedom.

What prompted students to start the Berkeley Free Speech Movement Quizlet? ›

The movement began when the university decided to restrict students' rights to distribute literature and to recruit volunteers for political causes on campus.

Who started the Free Speech Movement at Berkeley? ›

In 1964, Mario Savio and 500 fellow students marched on Berkeley's administration building to protest the university's order. He and other leaders called for an organized student protest to abolish all restrictions on students' free-speech rights throughout the University of California system.

Was the Free Speech Movement successful? ›

In the end, the FSM won all of its most important free speech demands, making it possible for registered student organizations to meet not only on the disputed stretch of sidewalk but anywhere on campus, and to hold political events free of charge and subject only to relatively minimal limitations.

Which college started the Free Speech Movement? ›

Mario Savio (born December 8, 1942, Queens, New York—died November 6, 1996, Sebastopol, California) U.S. educator and student free-speech activist who reached prominence as spokesman for the 1960s Free Speech Movement (FSM) at the University of California, Berkeley.

How did free speech help the civil rights movement? ›

(AP Photo/Fred E. Noel, Republished with permission from The Associated Press.) The First Amendment proved to be a crucial tool for the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s, as ministers preached, protesters marched, organizations litigated, advocates petitioned, and the press reported on racial discrimination.

What were the students against in the 1960s? ›

The student movement arose to demand free speech on college campuses, but as the US involvement in the Vietnam war expanded, the war became the main target of student-led protests.

What was the significance of Berkeley during the 1960s? ›

Berkeley In the Sixties Berkeley In the Sixties

From the Free Speech Movement to the anti-war protests to the last stand over People's Park, Berkeley, California became synonymous with a generation's quest for social, political, and cultural transformation.

What happened at the UC Berkeley strike of 1969? ›

1969 UC Berkeley TWLF

The coalition led a five-month campus strike to demand a radical shifts away from admissions practices that mostly excluded students of color. They also advocated for comprehensive reform of the curriculum, which was regarded as irrelevant to the lives of students of color.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Rob Wisoky

Last Updated:

Views: 5968

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (68 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Rob Wisoky

Birthday: 1994-09-30

Address: 5789 Michel Vista, West Domenic, OR 80464-9452

Phone: +97313824072371

Job: Education Orchestrator

Hobby: Lockpicking, Crocheting, Baton twirling, Video gaming, Jogging, Whittling, Model building

Introduction: My name is Rob Wisoky, I am a smiling, helpful, encouraging, zealous, energetic, faithful, fantastic person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.